Assessment Framework for the Evaluation of Wildfire Risk Reduction Strategies
University of Tasmania
Nicolás is a PhD Candidate in Medical Sciences at the Menzies Institute for Medical Research from the University of Tasmania. His research interests involve the application of engineering-type tools, economics, and modelling to policy-related environmental and energy problems. During his PhD, he will introduce health impact and economic assessments into the evaluation of wildfire risk reduction strategies.
Nicolás comes from Chile where he completed his undergraduate studies as an Industrial Engineer with a Diploma in Environmental Engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. After working several years as an environmental and sustainability consultant, he completed a Master of Environment at the University of Melbourne in Australia. On his return to Chile in 2014 he worked as an environmental data analyst at the Environmental Enforcement Agency, where he gained better knowledge about environmental regulations and the use of analytics tools for data manipulation and the assessment of environmental compliance. With more than ten years of working experience in areas such as air quality and human health impacts, public policy, public health, environmental regulations and analytics, decision-support systems, Nicolás looks forward to merging this knowledge into applicable tools and frameworks that will contribute to improve human wellbeing.
Project Status: Research ongoing
Why was funding this research important?
Wildfire risk reduction strategies (such as hazard reduction burning) have significant impacts on people with asthma through production of smoke and fine particulate matter (PM2.5).
During wildfires and interventions such as prescribed burning, a large population might be exposed to very high short-term (ranging from hours to days) concentrations of PM2.5. There is strong evidence these episodes cause increased asthma symptoms and medication use, and increased incidence of hospital admissions for asthma. This is why it is essential that the health and economic costs of bushfires and bushfire management strategies such as prescribed burning explicitly consider the health impacts of smoke.
“People with asthma are amongst the most and first affected with fire smoke episodes. I hope that my research helps raise awareness of the health burden associated with fire smoke, and push for improving the lives of people with asthma at least in the following two ways: 1) Inform people with asthma about the risks of being exposed to fire smoke, whether this comes from prescribed burn activities or bushfires, and 2) Increase awareness of decision makers so that this issue (fire smoke and health) is incorporated in the fire management risk communication process.” – Nicolas Borchers
What are the researchers doing?
The main objective of this research is to provide evaluation tools that are needed to do this. The project aims to develop an integrated assessment framework that will allow practitioners to objectively evaluate the health impacts that wildfire risk reduction strategies impose on society and the environment. Different regimes of prescribed burning and alternative approaches to modifying available fuels will be assessed to explore least impact strategies, with a special emphasis on health impacts produced by reduced air quality levels.
This PhD research includes the following projects;
- Literature review on climate change, bushfires, heatwaves and health impacts in Australia
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of fire smoke PM and asthma outcomes
- Historical health impacts from vegetation smoke: Bushfires vs. woodsmoke in Tasmania
- Health costs attributable to PM daily standard exceedances in Western Australia
- Impacts of the 2019/2020 Bushfires in East Australia
- Historical bushfire mortality impacts in Australia: direct fatalities vs. premature mortality
- Historical health impacts from fire smoke: wildfires vs prescribed burning in Sydney
- Burden of asthma in Australia attributable to smoke
- Finding the best wildfire risk reduction strategy: An assessment of prescribed burning vs forest management and wood stove exchange program
“Initially, funding from Asthma Australia shifted my focus to have a closer look at the impacts of bushfire smoke on asthma, and not just overall disease. I was surprised to see that impacts of fire smoke PM2.5 on asthma outcomes are quite relevant, and considerably higher than those of a ‘typical’ PM2.5 mixture, which include different emissions sources such as mobile, industrial and residential.” – Nicolas Borchers
Related Publications and Presentations
1. Borchers Arriagada, Horsley, Palmer, Morgan, Tham and Johnston 2019, Association between fire smoke fine particulate matter and asthma-related outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis, Environmental Research, 179(A), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108777
2. Borchers Arriagada, Bowman, Palmer and Johnston 2020, Climate Change, Wildfires, Heatwaves and Health Impacts in Australia. In: Akhtar R. (eds) Extreme Weather Events and Human Health, Springer, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23773-8_8
3. Borchers-Arriagada, Palmer, Bowman, Williamson and Johnston 2020, Health Impacts of Ambient Biomass Smoke in Tasmania, Australia, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(9), 3264, access online: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/9/3264
4. Borchers Arriagada, Palmer, Bowman, Morgan, Jalaludin and Johnston 2020, Unprecedented smoke-related health burden associated with the 2019-20 bushfires in eastern Australia, Medical Journal of Australia, doi: 10.5694/mja2.50545
5. Borchers Arriagada, Palmer, Bowman and Johnston 2020, Exceedances of national air quality standards for particulate matter in Western Australia: sources and health-related impacts, Medical Journal of Australia, accessed online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.5694/mja2.50547